Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1939No. Nos. 2279, 182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move to consolidate the above-entitled actions. The parties in both actions are the same. The complaints are based upon the same allegations of fraud and conspiracy. The effect of the consolidation is only to add additional parties. This motion is made pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 42 (a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The actions involve “a common question of law or fact.”

Though the facts presented as a basis for this application are most unusual, it seems to me that all the issues can properly be settled in a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ball Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. United States v. Sweet Little Mexico Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 2011
  3. Vives Vázquez v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API