Cent. Square Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Cent. Square Cent. Sch. Dist.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
By express provision both of the “Statement of Grievance” and of the agreement reached by the parties at the commencement of the arbitration the issue submitted for resolution was whether the district had violated article II (subd G) or article XXVII (subd A), or both, of the collective bargaining agreement by assigning teachers in the junior high school to cafeteria duty. The arbitrator concluded: “This grievance is upheld” — a determination in favor of the teachers association of the precise…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Peckerman v. D & D AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Arbitration between Guetta & Raxon Fabrics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Balis v. Chubb Group of InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Arbitration between Massena Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.