Legal Opinion

Pullman Trust & Savings Bank v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 6, 1964No. 63 C 344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

This cause is presently before me on the motion of the defendant, the United States of America, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, or in lieu thereof for summary judgment. Title 49 §§ 781-788 deal with “Seizure and Forfeiture of Carriers Transporting, etc., Contraband Articles”. The automobile was forfeited to the United States pursuant to the authority of these sections.

Both parties agree as to the facts, which the government’s memorandum in support of its motion sets out as follows, and which I adopt as my findings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1958 Pontiac Coupe, Serial No. P-858h2925Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. One 1957 Buick RoadmasterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jary Leasing Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API