Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1990No. Nos. 2-89-201-CV through 2-89-212-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from twelve separate bond forfeiture proceedings. The trial court remitted the entire bond amount in each case but deducted statutory costs against the surety from each remitted bond amount.

In this case of first impression, the issue before us is whether the State is authorized to withhold interest from a surety on an appearance bond and calculate this amount from the judgment nisi date until the entry of a final judgment remitting the bond under TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 22.16 (Vernon 1989). We hold that, under the particular facts before us,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cardenas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Lubbock Independent School District v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Keith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Chavarria-SanchezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Juana Mendez Valdez, Et Vir Juan Valdez v. Melody Mueller Moerbe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. People v. Chavarria-SanchezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. Chavarria-SanchezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API