Pekin Insurance v. Recurrent Training Center, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Presiding Justice Quinn and Justice Neville concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
Plaintiff, Pekin Insurance Company, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of whether it owed defendant Recurrent Training Center a duty to defend it in underlying litigation. The trial court found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend Recurrent Training Center in the underlying actions. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In January 2006, Recurrent Training Center, which is located in Savoy, Illinois, trained Mark Turek on the operation of a Cessna 421 B…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Robidoux v. OliphantIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Bier v. Leanna Lakeside Property Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Byer Clinic and Chiropractic, LTD. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Firebirds International, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- Indiana Insurance Company v. Royce Realty & Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Abbey Ridge LLC v. Addison Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Donnellan v. The Travelers Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.