Legal Opinion

McIntire v. Tyson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

New trial. Practice in the Superior Court. Before Judge Chisholm. City Court of Savannah. July Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

1. In this case the city court granted a new trial. We will not control its discretion in granting it on the ground that the evidence is decidedly against the verdict. No great harm can be done. Besides, we think the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, though perhaps the verdict could be sustained.

2. A motion was made to dismiss the motion for a new trial because no rule nisi had been granted. The plaintiffs in error, after the lost papers had been established, waived service of the rule nisi. The object of the rule nisi was to bring them before the court. After they…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stoner v. McDougallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. UsrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Clements v. LeddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Davis v. HardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Newton Banking Co. v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API