Legal Opinion

City of Baton Rouge v. Van Valkenburg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 7, 1971No. 51288PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDERS, Justice.

The City of Baton Rouge charged Rudy Van Valkenburg with refusing a chemical breath test for intoxication in violation of Section 233, Title 11 of the Baton Rouge City Code, applicable to automobile drivers. The defendant filed a motion to quash the affidavit, alleging that the ordinance on which the charge was based was unconstitutional. On March 4, 1971, the court held a hearing on the motion. The defendant and- the city attorney filed a joint stipulation of facts. Other evidence was also introduced. The city attorney offered the “1968 .Alcohol and Highway Safety Report/’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. State v. ElfertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. State v. MoyeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  5. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CraddockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. State v. MalletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. State v. LobueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API