Legal Opinion

National Tube Co. v. Smith

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Ohio County. Bill by the National Tube Company against G. O. Smith. Decree for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BhaNNON, President:

The National Tube Company filed a bill in equity in Ohio county against George O. Smith, stating that it is a New Jersey corporation doing business in this State in the manufacture of steel and iron tubing, and employing many thousands of men in this and other states; that said Smith, a resident of West Virginia, had brought one hundred and forty-two suits before justices of the peace of Ohio county against emploj^es of the company residing in Pennsylvania on claims assigned to Smith, contracted in Pennsylvania with residents of Pennsylvannia and still residing in it; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FredlockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Keyser v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Hendrie v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Pierce v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Stevens v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  2. Guy F. Atkinson Corp. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Deepwater Co. v. Motter & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API