People v. Rodriguez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings *479County (Demurest, J.), rendered December 23, 1996, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. AndrewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002