Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings *479County (Demurest, J.), rendered December 23, 1996, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AndrewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API