Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Stearns

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The husband and two of the children of the testatrix would construe' the language of the third clause of the will of Mrs. Stearns, “I hereby give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my personal estate,” as devising and bequeathing all the residue and remainder of the real and personal estate of the testatrix. The husband and the two children of the testatrix contend that the term used in the third clause of the will is equivocal or ambiguous as to the property disposed of therein, and that the intent of the testatrix, the ascertainment of which is the primary end of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  2. In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Graham v. GrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Jackson v. AlsopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Fairfield v. LawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Mitchell v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of ZweigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API