Legal Opinion

Holstein v. UAL Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 9, 1987No. 87 C 3888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Peter Holstein filed this action against UAL Corporation (“UAL”) and the individual members of UAL’s board of directors after UAL adopted a Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”). The complaint consists of four counts. In count I Holstein alleges that UAL’s adoption of the Rights Plan violated federal securities laws relating to tender offers. Counts II, III and IV are pendent state claims in which Holstein alleges that UAL’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by adopting the Rights Plan and by engaging in other…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clearfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Omega Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API