Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ballenger v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 21, 1993No. A93A1575Published

1DissentBlackburn, Judge

I must respectfully dissent, because I do not agree that requiring a DUI convict to wear a fluorescent pink identification bracelet identifying him as such, as a condition of probation, serves any legitimate purpose of probation.

OCGA § 42-8-35 sets forth 12 acceptable conditions that may be imposed on probation. As noted by the majority opinion, however, that list is not exclusive. Parkerson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 440 (274 SE2d 799) (1980). “The probation and suspension statutes in Georgia vest broad discretion in trial judges. In the absence of express authority to the contrary, we see no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CollettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Inman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Parkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API