Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. S. C. Toth, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with memorandum, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The City of Rochester appeals from a judgment awarding respondent $460,142 with interest and a 5% extra allowance pursuant to section 16 of the Condemnation Law as compensation for the appropriation of respondent’s property at 200 Clinton Avenue on July 15, 1970. The subject was, at the time of taking, improved with a wholesale-retail laundry and dry cleaning plant with quick service drive-in facilities. Respondent maintained that the highest and best use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. McDonald v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. City of Glen Cove v. Switzer Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re West Bushwick Urban Renewal AreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Gorge Terminal Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. City of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Rochester Storage WarehouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API