United States v. Edwards
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
CARMICHAEL, Judge:
This case is before the court a second time. Initially, pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), appellant asserted he was materially prejudiced by the inflexible attitude of a court member during the sentencing process. We concluded that the case was free of prejudicial error and affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. United States v. Edwards, ACMR 8601248 (A.C.M.R. 8 May 1987) (unpub.). On 15 October 1987, the United States Court of Military Appeals set aside our decision and specified two issues for our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. SherrodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. WebsterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. KeyesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991