Legal Opinion

S.M.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1990No. 90-1143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant S.M.M. appeals his adjudication of delinquency of the offense of grand theft. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that he committed grant theft, where the state failed to prove the value of the stolen items; and that his unrefuted, exculpatory and reasonable explanation for possession of the recently stolen property rendered the evidence insufficient to support his adjudication for grand theft. We affirm the trial court’s ruling as to guilt of theft, however, we agree that the state failed to prove the value of the stolen property, and reverse and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. In Interest of FRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. I.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Celeste Chambers v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Zanterrial Dejohn Carter v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. M.K., a child v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. D.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API