Legal Opinion

Zenker v. Zenker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1928No. Appeal 14PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

There is no dispute of fact in this. case. T. F. Zenker is a contractor 'and builder in the City of Scranton. He employs in his business from five to twelve men, depending on “how large the job is”; “average about six men.” His workmen’s compensation liability as. such employer is insured in The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, the appellant. One of his employes in the contracting and building business was his son, Peter F. Zenker, the claimant, whose job it was to drive a truck, run the concrete mixer and act as general handy man about the business. He worked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Atherholt v. William Stoddart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Knowles v. Parker Wylie Carpet Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Nichols v. Davidson Hotel CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Hunter v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API