Legal Opinion

In re H. J. Quimby Freight Forwarding Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 14, 1903No. 6,615PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

The respondent in this case was incorporated as a “common carrier of property or persons.” Some of its officers testified that a large part of its business was the buying and selling of horses, hay, grain, wagons, harnesses, etc., and that most of its business was outside the usual business of a common carrier. An examination of the books, which were not produced before the referee, leaves little weight in this testimony. The cor*140poration bought the articles above mentioned, as every express company and every carrier of this sort must do. These purchases do not make a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re New York & W. Water Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
  2. In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
  3. In re Surety Guarantee & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  4. In re Mutual Mercantile AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  5. In re Elk Park Mining & Milling Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Kingston Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. In re Mathews Consolidated Slate Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
  3. United States Hotel Co. v. NilesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. In re Marine Const. & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  5. In re New York & New Jersey Ice LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API