Legal Opinion

Griess & Ginder Drywall, Inc. v. Moran

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 23, 1997No. 95-1708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The decisive issue in this appeal is whether notice of a potential mechanic’s hen from a subcontractor to a homeowner before work commences reheves the subcontractor of the statutory requirement to perfect the hen. The district court did not think so and neither do we. We affirm.

In July 1992 Pierce Construction agreed to build a house for Mark and Rechelle Moran. Pierce Construction subcontracted the dry walling to Griess & Ginder Drywah, Inc. at a price of $2696. At that time, legal title to the land was in Pierce Construction, and the Morans had contracted to buy the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carson v. RoedigerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Northwestern National Bank of Sioux City v. Metro Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Louie's Floor Covering, Inc. v. DePhillips Interests, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly Concrete Company, Inc. v. Jim Sattler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2021
  2. Summer's Enterprise, Inc. v. Hudson Land Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API