Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1996No. 1950731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Defendant, Gold Kist, Inc., petitioned for certiorari review, arguing that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in reversing a judgment entered in its favor following a jury trial. See Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc., 686 So.2d 258 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995).

Sherry Duke, an employee of the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA"), was injured while working at her job when she slipped in water, grease, and other substances that had accumulated on the floor of Gold Kist's poultry processing plant. The USDA had an office and a break room at the Gold Kist plant to facilitate the inspection of poultry.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terry v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Campbell v. Valley Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Duke v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sessions v. NonnenmannSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Jones Food Co., Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Dolgencorp, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Barnwell v. CLP Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Sheikh v. Lakeshore FoundationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API