Cate v. Hutchinson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Nuckolls county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Cate & Foristall are licensed physicians and surgeons engaged in the practice of their profession at Nelson, in this state. They brought this action against the defendant to recover the sum of $176.04, claimed to be a balance due on account for medical services rendered the Hutchinson family in the year 1894. The first defense pleaded ■in the answer was in substance a general denial; the second that many of the visits included in the itemized account were gracious acts of friendship and not made in the performance of a professional duty; the third alleged that the charges made in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vilas v. DownerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Blodgett v. McMurtryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Starin v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Shelton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Tucker v. Mayor of VirginiaNevada Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- In Re Dunbier's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Kleinknecht v. McNultyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Folken v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Bliss v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.