Legal Opinion

United States v. Raymond Jarlik Bell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2014No. 13-30163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOULD; Concurrence by Judge HAWKINS.

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Raymond Bell (“Bell”) appeals from his jury convictions for making false, fictitious, and fraudulent claims to the United States Treasury under 18 U.S.C. § 287, assisting in the filing of false tax returns under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3), and mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Bell also appeals the district court’s supervised release conditions imposed as part of his sentence. We must decide (1) whether the district court committed reversible error under the Sixth Amendment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul RichterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Michael Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Terrance HofusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API