Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Jenks

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 23, 1946No. File No. 16330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is in court. Assuming that a temporary injunction in a given case were issued ex parte, it cannot be said that a motion to dissolve may not be treated as a demurrer. A demurrer has been filed to the application for such an injunction. That the granting of a temporary injunction lies in the sound discretion of the court is so fundamental as not to require supporting citation. In this state there is no appeal from the issuance of a temporary injunction. As was said by this court (Inglis, J.), "if a temporary injunction is once issued there is no stay possible and the defendant may…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dodd v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Waterbury Savings Bank v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  3. City of New London v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Seeley v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. Wilcox v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zoning Commission v. LeninskiConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  2. Waterbury Homeowners Ass'n v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Superior Court · 1969
  3. Kwiatkoski v. Johnson, No. Cv93 0307032s (Oct. 27, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
  4. Zoning Commission of Sachem's Head Ass'n v. LeninskiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API