Henry Prouse Cooper & Co. v. Wandel
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment entered upon a decision that the answer interposed was sham and frivolous.
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
The defendants were sureties upon an undertaking given on behalf of one Alexander D. Findlay, who was arrested in an action brought against him, and which proceeded duly to judgment. This action was in due time and upon all necessary facts to establish the defendants’ liability commenced, and after much delay an answer was served which upon application duly made, was declared to be sham and frivolous, was' stricken out and judgment ordered for the plaintiff. The defense set up was as follows :
Third. For a defense in this action the defendants allege, *10upon information and belief, that after…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Billington v. . WagonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Concordia Savings and Aid Ass'n v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Hallett v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1820
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana Sulphur Mining Co. v. Brimstone R. & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Wolfsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958