Legal Opinion

Sherman Markman and Betty Lea Markman v. Russell State Bank, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1966No. 8303_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANGLEY, District Judge.

The appellants, Sherman Markman and Betty Lea Markman, husband and wife, together with two other couples not here involved, on April 26, 1960, at Russell, Kansas, executed a promissory note in the amount of $40,490.40 to one Bud Brandeberry. The note was payable in 180 days but contained a consent to extension of the payment date without notice after maturity. Later, on July 22, 1960, the same persons executed an additional promissory note to Bud Brande-berry in the amount of $45,000.00, payable October 23, 1960. This note contained the same provision as the first for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Elk Valley Coal Co. v. Third National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Bank v. United Plastics Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  2. Maryland Casualty Company v. Donald G. Lambert and Sharon W. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Mitchell v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Mitchell)District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API