Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Kasper

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 27, 2004No. 02-01791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION RE MOTION TO COMPEL DEBTOR’S COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C. § 521(2)

S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

The court will deny the motion filed by Ford Motor Credit Company (“Ford”) to compel the debtor, Donald B. Kasper, to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 521(2).

I

PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF CASE

Kasper filed his voluntary bankruptcy petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.) 1 on September 11, 2002, and owned at that time an automobile. Kasper scheduled Ford, as holding a lien on that car, securing a claim in excess of the car’s scheduled value. Kasper did not claim the car as exempt.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matthews v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Chambers v. Greenpoint Credit (In Re Chambers)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  3. In Re CornejoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  4. In re FaillaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  5. In re WareUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API