Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Lanterman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1984No. 4-83-0392PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

In this appeal which we allowed on plaintiffs application under Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308) we are called upon to decide two questions certified by the trial court: (1) the right to maintain a partition action during the pendency of an estate in probate, and (2) the authority of the circuit court to stay a partition action pending the resolution of a will contest action involving the estate of one of the co-tenants. For the reasons given below, we affirm the trial court’s stay of the partition action until the estate is closed and the will contest is resolved.

The main thrust of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Oglesby v. Springfield Marine BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hill v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Aid v. SantosIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaden v. PucinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Couri v. KornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Doe v. LutzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Company v. Leighton Legal Group, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Illinois State Bar Assoc. Mutual Insurance Co. v. Leighton Legal Group, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API