Legal Opinion

Rosa v. Delacruz

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Decided October 23, 2018No. 146 SSM 23PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM.

***1061The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motions for summary judgment, defendants relied on independent physician reports finding that plaintiff had a normal range of motion six months following the accident, with no permanent effects, and on the results of a shoulder MRI performed six weeks after the accident by plaintiff's radiologist, who reported that plaintiff's rotator cuff tendons were intact and there was no MRI evidence of a tear. Plaintiff's responding medical submissions were inadequate to raise a triable issue of fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. FuquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. HamellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. People v. KosmetatosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. People v. LathropAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API