Rosa v. Delacruz
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM.
***1061The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In support of their motions for summary judgment, defendants relied on independent physician reports finding that plaintiff had a normal range of motion six months following the accident, with no permanent effects, and on the results of a shoulder MRI performed six weeks after the accident by plaintiff's radiologist, who reported that plaintiff's rotator cuff tendons were intact and there was no MRI evidence of a tear. Plaintiff's responding medical submissions were inadequate to raise a triable issue of fact…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. FuquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. HamellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. KosmetatosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. LathropAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.