Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Robert D. Golden

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1956No. 35, Docket 24111Published

1ConcurrenceFrank, Circuit Judge

I agree that, for the reasons stated in my colleagues’ opinion, denial of appellant’s motion was not appealable as a final decision under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. I do not, however, wish my participation in this decision to be taken as implying a belief that, in a case of this nature, the appeal should not be treated as a petition for mandamus1 or that, in appropriate circumstances in a criminal action, a writ of mandamus ordering the District Court to decide the motion on its merits, should not issue.2 I place my concurrence solely *880on the ground that, on the facts as alleged by appellant, he will…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Allen v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API