Evans v. Carey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division and its upholding of the constitutionality of Executive Order No. 10 (9 NYCRR 3.10). In such affirmance we, as did the Appellate Division, distinguish Griswold v Connecticut (381 US 479), a case which recognized and broadly delineated a right to privacy but in a vastly different situation. Rather than rely on such cases as California Bankers Assn. v Shultz (416 US 21), United States v Miller (425 US 434), Fisher v United States (425 US 391), and Buckley v Valeo (424 US 1), each of which involves an unsuccessful challenge to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kenneth A. Plante v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc., Jon C. Thomas v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Snider v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hunter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Goldstein v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.