Vallone v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
In his motion for rehearing appellant urges with much earnestness that we were wrong in holding that bills of exception numbers three, four and five did not present reversible error.
The questions complained of in the said three bills are set out in our original opinion. It must be borne in mind that all the questions were answered in the negative. It was appellant’s contention that the questions were asked with the purpose of prejudicing the jury against appellant; that the State had no evidence to substantiate the matters embraced in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McNaulty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Ard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.