Legal Opinion

Vallone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1940No. 21011Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges with much earnestness that we were wrong in holding that bills of exception numbers three, four and five did not present reversible error.

The questions complained of in the said three bills are set out in our original opinion. It must be borne in mind that all the questions were answered in the negative. It was appellant’s contention that the questions were asked with the purpose of prejudicing the jury against appellant; that the State had no evidence to substantiate the matters embraced in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McNaulty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Ard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API