Legal Opinion
Konchel Ex Rel Konchel v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 4, 1998No. CV 97-418 TUC JMRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
49 F.Supp.2d 1155 (1998)
Anna KNOCHEL, by and through her parents and guardians ad litem, James and Lynn KNOCHEL, on their own behalf, Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant.
No. CV 97-418 TUC JMR.
United States District Court, D. Arizona.
December 4, 1998.
Ted A. Schmidt, Kinerk, Beal, Schmidt & Dyer, P.C., Trial Lawyers, Tucson, AZ, for plaintiffs.
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Janet Napolitano, United States Attorney, Paul F. Figley, Deputy Director, Steven B. Snyder, Trial Attorney, Torts Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant.
ORDER
ROLL,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Everett Todd Faber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.