Legal Opinion

Bank of Marion v. Beck

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1940No. 4-5679Published

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

The agreed statement is that O. E. Sharp, appellee’s tenant, owed appellee $1,198.20 for rent and supplies. Proceeds of 60 bales of cotton upon which appellee had a landlord’s lien were, without appellee’s knowledge or consent, applied on Sharp’s note to the Bank of Marion. The bank knew of the lien. Sharp either directed or acquiesced in the transaction. The landlord’s account was due November 1, 1937.

In February, 1938, the bank became insolvent. Appellee’s suit was filed April 12. The bank, Sharp, and representatives in charge of the bank, were made defendants. The claim was not presented…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Reavis v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Judge v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Walker v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Taylor v. Dierks Lumber Coal CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API