Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Whitney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The suit in tbe court below was by Whitney and Wheat against Prosser and the other plaintiffs in error to recover upon a bond given on taking an appeal in chancery. In the chancery cause Whitney and Wheat were complainants and Prosser was one of several defendants. The decree denied to the complainants the relief they prayed, but it also denied costs of his defence to Prosser. Complainants appealed and so did Prosser; and under the statute the parties appealing were required to give bond to *406abide tbe order of tbe appellate court. Prosser’s bond was in the penal sum of one hundred and fifty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Proctor v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. NimsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Michie v. EllairMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API