Legal Opinion

In re Holfeld

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 19, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an attorney disciplinary proceeding against Stephan J. Holfeld, Esquire (“Holfeld”). Holfeld was found to have violated Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Disciplinary Procedure (“Procedural Rule”) 7(c) and Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“Conduct Rule”) 8.4(d), by failing to file timely pre-certifica-tions with his 2011 and 2012 Supreme Court Certificates of Compliance as required under the conditions of a private admonition.

We have determined that the appropriate sanction is a public reprimand with conditions, as recommended by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re TenenbaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API