Legal Opinion

In re Tanisha Shabazz A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The finding of abandonment is supported by clear and convincing evidence, including petitioner agency’s case record and testimony, which at best shows only “[s]poradic and minimal attempts to visit and communicate with the child” during the relevant time period (Matter of Latoya P., 305 AD2d 263, 264 [2003] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 100 NY2d 508 [2003]; see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]).

Petitioner demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, *483that the child was permanently neglected within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a). Contrary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Byron Christopher Malik J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re Latoya P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Mia Veronica B. (Brandy Veronica R.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. In re Alliyah C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re Alliyah C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API