Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 401(b) or 28 U.S.C. § 1337.
FACTS
In 1973, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 47 U.S.C. § 220(b), the Communications Act of 1934, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) began a study of depreciation practices in the telephone industry. In 1980, after reviewing various proposals, conducting hearings and soliciting comments from utility companies, state regulatory commissions, members of the accounting profession and other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Brookhaven Cable TV Inc. v. KellyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1983
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public Service RegulationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1983
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service BoardDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.