Legal Opinion

Casey v. City of Miami Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

The order appealed from presents to this Court the question of the validity of Ordinances numbered 391 and 394 of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. It is contended by counsel for plaintiffs in error that the said ordinances are unreasonable, discriminatory, and as framed are class legislation, which makes each thereof invalid.

Ordinance No. 391 permits or allows the sale of intoxicating liquors at places designated or commonly known as “bars” from 7:00 o’clock A. M. until 2:00 o’clock A. M. the following day, being a period of nineteen hours; while under the provisions of Ordinance No. 394,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Floyd v. NoelSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Levi v. State Ex Rel. Palm Court Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardage v. City of Jacksonville BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Cowan v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API