Legal Opinion · Dissent

Avery v. Virginia Retirement System

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 15, 2000No. 2325984Published

1DissentBumgardner, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I conclude the trial court lacked active jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The Virginia Retirement System demurred to the petition for appeal and stated, “without proper service of process this Court has no jurisdiction.” That raised the issue that the parties briefed and argued to this Court en banc: Is delivery of process by Federal Express service of process?

Avery never served process on the agency. She mailed a copy of the petition for appeal. After the demurrer raised the issue of lack of service, she had process issued but had it delivered by Federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayo v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. Sours v. VIRGINIA BOARD FOR ARCHITECTSCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Duvall v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Harrel v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API