Legal Opinion

Ernestine v. Prather v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 13, 1968No. 21216_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant sisters claimed as heirs-at-law of an intestate decedent yclept Eddie Burl. He had been reared as their brother in the home of their parents and had been described over the years, routinely and consistently, as adopted. However there was never a documentation of adoption or a formal proceeding to that end. District Judge Matthews rejected the claims of the sisters and sustained^ escheat to the District of Columbia. She filed with her ruling a careful opinion. 1 Upon the premises there stated and discussed, we affirm.

Affirmed.

1. In re Estate of McConnell, 268 F.Supp. 346 (D.D.C.1967).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of McConNellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Board of Education v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994