Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Conger
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 15, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Staley, S.
The above claim having been rejected by the executor is brought on for determination in the proceeding for final settlement in this estate. The claim arises out of the following instrument executed by the decedent in his lifetime:
“ Centenary Estate Pledge “ For the Board of Home Missions and Church Extension and for the Board of Foreign Missions of the Methodist Episcopal Church
(Manly W. Conger) March 20,1919
“ In consideration of my interest in Christian Missions, and on condition that the above named Boards secure other subscriptions for this cause, and for value received,.I hereby…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Worth v. . CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Holmes v. . RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kerrigan's Estate v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Gostina v. WhithamWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Claim of the First Methodist Episcopal Church v. Estate of HowardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.