Badach v. Caggiano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly directed plaintiffs to provide authorizations permitting defendant to obtain medical records and reports relating to those conditions placed in issue by the instant action (see, Coddington v Lisk, 249 AD2d 817; Syron v Paolelli, 238 AD2d 710; McGuane v M.C.A., Inc., 182 AD2d 1081, 1083). We reject plaintiffs’ contention that the court abused its discretion in directing plaintiffs to pay half the cost of obtaining duplicate copies of the records and reports of treating and examining physicians acquired by defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nitz v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tower v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Coddington v. LiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- McGuane v. M.C.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hualde v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vinings Spinal Diagnostic v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2006