Legal Opinion
Dowell v. Pletcher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 2013No. 110,774PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
11 Appellants are a licensed bail bondsman and several insurance companies that issue bail bonds who complain that the defendant, Curt Pletcher, a registered professional bail bondsman in Tulsa County, is violating the Ten Bond Rule, 59 0.8.2011 $ 1320(B), of the Oklahoma Bail Bondsmen Act by using a surety bondsman to write more than ten *459bonds per year in Oklahoma County. The "Ten Bond Rule" provides, in pertinent part:
No bail bondsman shall become a surety on any undertaking unless he has first registered his license in the office of the sheriff and with the clerk of the district court in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Surety Bail Bondsmen of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Insurance CommissionerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Cloer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3Cited by30 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- EDWARDS v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- BERRY AND BERRY ACQUISITIONS v. BFN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- OWENS v. ZUMWALTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.