Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Manoli
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (100 AD2d 928; see also, Frerk v Mercy Hosp., 99 AD2d 504, affd 63 NY2d 635).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Judges Jasen and Meyer on constraint of Parker v Mack (61 NY2d 114).
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Frerk v. Mercy HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Frerk v. Mercy HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Micro-Spy, Inc. v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Long Island Citizens Campaign, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Farkas v. Tarrytown Lumber, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Burrell v. Countrytowne Apartment PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Wells v. Mount Sinai Hospital and Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993