Austin Powder Co. v. Atlas Powder Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, Chief Judge.
Four issues remain in this four year old patent case pitting Austin Powder Company (“Austin”) against Atlas Powder Company (“Atlas”): 1 (1) Are Claims 25 through 27 of the ’621 reissue patent unenforceable because of the failure of Austin’s counsel to submit to the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) certain documents obtained from Atlas during discovery in this litigation? (2) If not, was Atlas’ infringement of Claims 25 and 27 willful within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 284? (3) Is either side entitled to a determination that this is an “exceptional case” within…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, & Cross-Appellant v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Preemption Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Afros S.P.A. v. Krauss-Maffei Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Zimmer Surgical, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Mannesmann Demag Corp. v. Engineered Metal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Micro Motion, Inc. v. Exac Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.