Legal Opinion

Haft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1984No. 83-2255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

There is no error in the judgment that Norman F. Haft is guilty of criminal contempt. The appropriate fine for such an offense cannot exceed $500, however, the fine imposed here was $2,500. Section 775.02, Florida Statutes (1983); Aaron v. State, 284 So.2d 673 (Fla.1973) and Thomas A. Edison College, Inc. v. State Board of Independent Colleges & Universities, 411 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Thus, the order appealed is remanded to the trial court with directions to reduce the fine to not more than $500.00. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Thomas A. Edison College, Inc. v. STATE BD., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API