Atoka State Bank v. Cheek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
•SHACKELFORD, C.
The plaintiffs in error were the defendants be-lcm', and the defendants in error were the plaintiffs. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.
It appears from the record that the plaintiffs were the owners of certain undivided interests in .some tracts or parcels of land in Carter county; and the plaintiffs and the other defendants, except the Atoka State Bank, entered into a contract wherein the plaintiffs agreed to sell and the defendants ■to buy an oil and gas lease covering the ínteres's held by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McCormick v. Wheeler, Mellick & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Burton v. ComptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ferrell v. . HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Jones v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.