Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Defendant State of Wisconsin invokes 11th amendment immunity as an affirmative defense to all claims by plaintiffs. The other defendants contend they share in the State’s immunity. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, and monetary damages for past infringement of their rights. Although defendants have raised a variety of affirmative- defenses, I deal here only with whether 11th amendment immunity is available.
I
A state can waive its 11th amendment immunity. However, because of the gravity of the constitutional immunity afforded…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990
- LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND, ETC. v. State of Wis.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984