Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Nicholai

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1892No. 409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant as a common carrier, to recover the value of certain baggage alleged to have been lost in its transmission from the city of Portland, Oregon, to the city of Indianapolis.

The material averments of the complaint are: That on the 19th of October, 1889, the appellant, in consideration of $49 to it paid, undertook to safely carry the appellee and her baggage from Portland, Oregon, to Indianapolis, Indiana, by way of the Northern Pacific Eailroad, the Wisconsin Central Eailroad, and the appellant’s own railroad • that said baggage consisted of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Railway Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. McFadden v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams Express Co. v. CarnahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Voss v. Wagner Palace Car Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. United States Express Co. v. JoyceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. LiverightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API