Garland v. Samson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota; Page Morris, Judge. Action at law by William Garland against C. C. Samson and H. J. Tremain. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, C. C. Samson ,and H. J. Tremain, owned the Willard Hotel in St. Paul, Minn., and its furnishings. They then deeded the premises to H. C. Suttle and took a lease on the property and its furniture of him dated October 13, 1910. The lease was for five years with the privilege of ten from November 1, 1910. It provided for the payment of $1,200 a month rent, payable on the 15th of each month.' It contained the following provisions:
“Said lessees hereby agree to accept the premises herein let and demised in the condition which they are now in and hereby further…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Quist v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. Admiral Oriental LineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930