Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. American Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1933No. 12654Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM..

In the original opinion handed down the following was said:

“A few days after the loan to Kirby, Armstrong on, to wit, January 18, 1923, gave his note to the State Bank as he ha<j promised to do for $21,500 covering the aggregate amount of his indebtedness to that bank. A few days later Kirby indorsed this note as an accommodation to Armstrong.”

There was a clerical error in that statement which is withdrawn and the following is filed as a substitute therefor:

“Two and one half months after the loan to Kirby, Armstrong, on towit: April 18th, 1923, gave- his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City Nat. Bank of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Armstrong v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API